Web development for publicly traded companies.
Sites and investor-facing pages built with the accessibility, accuracy, and uptime standards public companies are held to — and the structured review process that comes with more than one stakeholder signing off.
What's included.
Investor relations page structure
Press releases, financial filing links, and governance documents organized the way investors and analysts actually expect to find them.
Accessibility & compliance-minded builds
WCAG-aware design and development — public company sites carry real accessibility-lawsuit exposure, and this isn't an afterthought for us.
Security & uptime discipline
A fragile plugin stack isn't acceptable when the site represents a publicly traded company — we build and maintain with that standard in mind.
Multi-stakeholder review workflows
Marketing, legal, IR, and comms all need their own review and approval path — we build the CMS and process around that, not a single-editor blog.
Straight answer: what we bring, and what we don't claim.
Our largest engagements are already enterprise-scale — a full rebrand and platform for ServCorp (SCx), a veteran-owned, SDVOSB-certified federal logistics firm with 2,500+ projects completed; a 25-year national kiosk and signage manufacturer in Meridian Kiosks; a 99-page hyperlocal SEO architecture for Kish Enclosures. That's the engineering discipline — structured scope, real QA, and systems built to hold up under real traffic — that a public-company build needs. We'll say plainly what we're not: we're not securities disclosure counsel, and we don't make the call on what's Reg FD-sensitive or when something can go live. Your legal, IR, and compliance teams keep that authority; we build the technical publishing workflow that makes their approval process fast and reliable instead of a bottleneck.
FAQ
Have you built specifically for a publicly traded company before?
Our direct case studies are large, high-stakes engagements — federal logistics, national manufacturing, multi-location enterprise builds — rather than a publicly traded company specifically. We're upfront about that. What carries over is the same engineering discipline: structured scope, accessibility, security, and review workflows built for more than one stakeholder.
Do you handle SEC or Reg FD-sensitive content decisions?
No — that's a legal and IR decision, not ours to make. We build the technical publishing workflow and approval gates; your legal and IR teams still own and approve what actually gets disclosed and when.
Can you work within our existing legal/compliance review process?
Yes — that's the point of building multi-stakeholder review into the CMS from the start, rather than trying to bolt an approval process on afterward.
What about uptime and security for a high-visibility site?
We build with monitoring, structured hosting, and a security-conscious plugin/dependency approach from day one — not as a response after something breaks.